2.4 C
New York
Thursday, February 12, 2026
Home Blog Page 1096

Sweden Beats Japan to Reach Women’s World Cup Semifinals

0

A Women’s World Cup of change, of unexpected early departures and tantalizing arrivals, has completed its upending of certainty and tradition.

No former champion remains in the tournament with two rounds to play.

Gone prematurely are the United States, with its four world championships, and Germany, with two. Ousted is Norway, the 1995 victor. And now Japan, the 2011 winner, has exited in the quarterfinals with a 2-1 defeat to Sweden on Friday in Auckland, New Zealand.

Of course, it would be highly inaccurate to consider Sweden an arriviste. It has participated in all nine Women’s World Cups, finishing second in 2003 and third three times. But it has never won a major tournament and longs to be a first-time champion.

Sweden will face Spain in the semifinals after smothering Japan’s versatile attack in the first half and then defending for its tournament life in the second. It built what seemed a secure lead early in the second half by scoring twice indirectly on its specialty, set pieces, then held on as Japan, desperate and energized, made a fierce, if futile, charge.

Japan, which had scored 14 goals in its first four matches and seemed a decent pick as the best team left in the tournament, did not manage a shot in the first half. It awakened as the exit door loomed, creating furious chances in the second half. But it will long regret a missed penalty kick in the 75th minute.

“We fought so hard because we wanted it,” Japan’s captain, Saki Kumagai, said through tears. “We want to go to the next round, of course.”

Sweden’s victory, Spain’s first trip to the semifinals and Japan’s exit seemed in keeping with the spirit of a World Cup with the tournament’s biggest-ever field, the highest attendance at this stage and the most receptive embrace of the newly risen and revealing ambitions of teams like Colombia, Jamaica, Nigeria, South Africa and Morocco.

Finally, FIFA can begin to say with some legitimacy that the Women’s World Cup offers an event of global, not merely regional or entrenched, possibility. The other side of the draw is a similar reflection of that growth: Australia will face France, and England, the reigning European champion, will play Colombia.

On Friday, Sweden pressed high through the first half to suffocate Japan’s attacks. But when it possessed the ball, Sweden was patient, using short passes to maintain possession and looking for a long ball to take advantage of its height and aerial skills.

In the 32nd minute, Sweden’s set-piece mastery delivered a scrappy goal. Six of its 11 goals in the tournament have come directly or indirectly from set pieces — four from corner kicks. This time, midfielder Kosovare Asllani’s free kick rattled around in the penalty area, and the defender Magdalena Eriksson kept the play alive with three jabs at the ball. Finally, it fell to her fellow center back, Amanda Ilestedt, who scored from just inside the six-yard box.

“I thought, ‘I’m just going to put it away now,’” Ilestedt said. “So that was a great feeling.”

Even before that, however, Sweden had set a physical tone against the smaller, younger Japanese players.

“They hadn’t played, like, a physical team until they played us,” said the Swedish substitute Sofia Jakobsson, who plays for the San Diego Wave in the National Women’s Soccer League. “We are bigger than them and could go into harder tackles.”

As the second half opened, Japan’s goalkeeper, Ayaka Yamashita, pushed a shot just wide from the charging Johanna Kaneryd, giving Sweden a corner kick. Fuka Nagano handled the ball as the corner sailed into the crowd in front of Japan’s goal, and after a video review, Sweden was awarded a penalty kick. Filippa Angeldal slotted the ball low and to the left, giving Sweden a 2-0 lead.

It was not a safe one.

“Something happened,” Jakobsson said. “I don’t know if they were growing into the game or we were becoming more tired.”

After playing more defensive-minded in the first half, Japan’s attack was energized by the substitute Jun Endo. Sweden had expected a vigorous comeback, with Eriksson warning before that match that Japan’s attack could “come from anywhere and they will never stop.” Her comment proved prophetic.

In the 75th minute, Japan won a penalty kick when the substitute forward Riko Ueki had her heel clipped by Sweden’s Madelen Janogy. But Ueki’s shot clanged off the crossbar, and her header on the rebound looped high over the goal.

It was suggested afterward to Sweden’s left back, Jonna Andersson, that her team was living a charmed existence in the knockout rounds, having survived a penalty shootout only five days earlier to eliminate the United States.

Andersson smiled and said she preferred to believe it was the imposing presence of Sweden’s superb goalkeeper, Zecira Musovic, not luck, that had made the difference again, at least on Ueki’s attempt. “Maybe it’s a good goalkeeper that takes some energy or disturbs the penalty taker,” Andersson said.

In the 87th minute, Japan finally scored on a rebound by Honoka Hayashi after a failed clearance by Sweden gifted her an easy shot at Musovic. But not even 10 minutes of added time were enough to find a tying goal.

Japan was gone. And a first-time Women’s World Cup champion waits its crowning moment.

“I think we have the team to go all the way,” Andersson said. “And now we are one step closer.”

Research Trials Halted at Columbia’s Psychiatric Center After Suicide

0

Federal regulators have suspended research on human subjects at the Columbia-affiliated New York State Psychiatric Institute, one of the country’s oldest research centers, as they investigate safety protocols across the institute after the suicide of a research participant.

A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Kate Migliaccio-Grabill, confirmed on Wednesday that the agency’s Office for Human Research Protections was investigating the psychiatric institute “and has restricted its ability to conduct H.H.S.-supported human subject research.”

About two weeks before the federal order, on June 12, the institute had “voluntarily paused all studies that included ongoing interactions with human subjects,” according to Carla Cantor, the institute’s director of communications. The decision affected 417 studies, of which 198 have continuing participation. Of those, 124 receive federal funding.

It is unusual for the U.S. regulatory office to suspend research, and this suggests that investigators are concerned that potential violations of safety protocols occurred more broadly within the institute. Almost 500 studies, with combined budgets totaling $86 million, are underway at the institute, according to its website.

The inquiry followed the death by suicide of a person enrolled in a study led by Dr. Bret R. Rutherford, an associate professor of psychiatry at Columbia University who was testing a drug for Parkinson’s disease, levodopa, as a treatment for depression and reduced mobility in older people.

Dr. Rutherford resigned his position at the institute on June 1 and is no longer a faculty member of Columbia’s psychiatry department, Ms. Cantor said. Dr. Rutherford did not respond to requests for comment left at his home and office.

Asked about the reported suicide, Ms. Cantor would not confirm that a death had occurred during a clinical trial, saying the institute could not provide any information about study participants because of health privacy laws.

The institute’s “top priority is the health and safety of individuals engaged in our award-winning research programs,” Ms. Cantor said in a statement.

She said the institute “worked to assist federal agencies in their audit and has subsequently restructured and strengthened its research compliance and monitoring programs across the institution.”

The institute, which is operated by the state Office of Mental Health, is seeking federal approval for a new research safety plan so that federally funded studies can resume, she said. It is also conducting a safety review of human research studies not funded by the federal government, which is expected to be complete next month.

After the initial audit of the Rutherford laboratory, the National Institutes of Health requested an external audit of all federally funded research, she said.

A spokeswoman for the N.I.H., Amanda Fine, said the agency was working closely with the Office of Human Research Protections, which is investigating the matter. N.I.H. cannot discuss matters under review, she said.

The subject’s suicide was reported earlier in Spectrum, a news site focusing on autism research. But the U.S. agency’s decision to order a widespread halt to other studies had not been disclosed before now.

The trial of levodopa for late-life depression, which began in 2018 and received $736,579 in funding from the National Institute of Mental Health, aimed to recruit 90 adults over the age of 60 who suffered from mild to moderate depression and a slowed gait.

The team ended up with just 51, of whom 20 dropped out or were found ineligible, according to records provided to federal oversight agencies. The 31 who remained were assigned to one of two groups, one taking levodopa and one taking a placebo.

On the website clinicaltrials.gov, under the heading “serious adverse events,” researchers reported that the individual who died by suicide had been assigned to the placebo arm of the study.

Dr. Rutherford and his co-authors published several articles based on the trial, reporting that levodopa, which increases dopamine concentrations, led to improvement in mobility, processing and depressive symptoms in the study population.

Dr. Bret R. Rutherford, who was an associate professor of psychiatry at Columbia University until he resigned in June.

The promising results were flagged in NEJM Journal Watch, which said that clinicians “might consider levodopa” for patients whose cognition or mobility did not respond to standard depression treatments.

It is not clear when the suicide occurred, but records show that the study was temporarily suspended by the National Institute of Mental Health in January 2022 and terminated in May 2023. This year, three scientific journals ran retractions identifying methodological errors in studies from Dr. Rutherford’s laboratory.

One of them pointed to a specific flaw: Eight subjects had only recently stopped taking an antidepressant, rather than waiting 28 days to “wash out,” as required by the study’s protocol. The average number of days those patients had been off medication was 10; one subject had been off medication only for a day.

A member of Columbia’s faculty since 2010, Dr. Rutherford was a prolific researcher, having received 32 grants totaling more than $15.5 million from N.I.M.H. since 2010.

Subjects in the study were paid $15 in cash for weekly visits and an additional $400 for undergoing M.R.I. and PET scans.

Emily Roberts, a former research assistant in Dr. Rutherford’s laboratory and a co-author on one of his papers, told Spectrum that recruiting for the study had been challenging and that some criteria had been relaxed to increase enrollment.

Ms. Roberts, who managed the clinical trial in its first year, said the experience left her disillusioned and contributed to her decision to leave the field. “I was disappointed at the rigor of the research there,” she said. Ms. Roberts verified her comments to Spectrum, but she would not publicly comment further on the matter.

Some studies of psychiatric drugs require participants to “wash out” — to go off the medications they are taking and allow them to clear their system, so that scientists can test the effectiveness of a new one.

This practice is specific to psychiatric research, and it creates a tension about what is best for patients, said Jeffrey Kahn, the director of the Berman Institute of Bioethics at Johns Hopkins University.

“There isn’t another category of drug trial where you ask someone to go off something they are on,” he said. “It’s a violation of a standard of care. You can’t tell someone, ‘Stop taking your chemotherapy so we can compare it to a new chemotherapy.’”

It is rare for regulators to halt research across an institution.

In 2015, the University of Minnesota suspended enrollment in psychiatric drug trials after a critical report by state auditors on the 2004 suicide of a patient who faced commitment to a state institution when he was enrolled in an industry-sponsored clinical trial of Seroquel, an antipsychotic drug.

In 2001, the Office for Human Research Protections ordered Johns Hopkins University to suspend almost all its federally financed medical research involving human subjects after the death of a volunteer who had inhaled an unapproved asthma drug.

In 2000, the federal agency temporarily suspended all medical research involving human subjects at the University of Oklahoma after an investigation showed that patients had been injected with a vaccine that had been made by unqualified laboratory workers.

If you are having thoughts of suicide, call or text 988 to reach the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline or go to SpeakingOfSuicide.com/resources for a list of additional resources.


With Over 20,000 Active Tutors “Tutor City” Easily Maintains Its Top Position As The Leading Home Tuition Agency in Singapore

0

Tutor City’s simple tutor-matching system can connect students with the best tutor that matches all their criteria.

Singapore, August 11, 2023, A good education is vital to personal success, this is beyond dispute. There are many reasons why a student may not fair so well in a typical academic environment. Peer pressures and bullying are a couple of examples of major stressors that can affect a student’s progress.

This is why Tutors play a vital role in topping off what students lack in terms of required course completion. The atmosphere at a student’s home or an employee’s office can be much more conducive to studying and learning.

Tutor City is the leading home tuition agency in Singapore since 2010, helping more than 40,000 parents find their ideal home tutor. They have it down to a science. Their system works and the myriad of Student Testimonials bears that out. Selecting the Best Tutor Service in Singapore is now an easy task. Recently, out of 19 Tutor Centers, Tutor City was Ranked #1.

They provide private tutoring services for students from primary school to junior college. Tutor City offers various subjects, including English, Math, Science, Chinese, and more.

They are sought after for:

  • Providing private tutoring services for students from primary school to junior college.
  • Offering various subjects, including English, Math, Science, Chinese, and more.
  • Providing one-to-one home tuition, online tuition, and group tuition options depending on the students’ and parents’ needs and preferences.
  • Having received positive reviews from many of its clients.

What are the types of home tutors?

Tutor City tutors are categorized according to their qualifications and experience. They do not set the tuition rate as tutors are freelance workers and specify their own hourly rate for home tuition. The tuition rates Singapore are based on averages according to the asking rates received daily from tutors applying for assignments.

Generally, there are 4 categories of home tutors in the Singapore market today, each with their own set of tuition rates, which also depends on the level and distance travelled.

1. Polytechnic/JC/Undergraduate Student Tutors
2. Part-Time Tutors
3. Full-Time Tutors
4. Ex-Teacher/Current Teacher

Student Testimonials really tell the story. Take a look at what Katla Roja had to say, “5 Stars – Tutor City Home Tuition is very responsible for helping students learn and understand new concepts and complete assignments by its tutors. Tutors prepare lessons by studying lesson plans, reviewing textbooks in detail to understand the topic they will be teaching and providing additional projects if needed during a session. Great tutors.”

For complete information, visit:  https://tutorcity.sg/

Janna Watson’s Paintings From Her Recent Solo Exhibition -“I Didn’t Eat The Garnish” – Are Currently on Display At Bau-Xi Art Gallery’s New Ontario Flagship Location

0

Watson’s paintings circulate regularly at international fairs, including Art Toronto, Art Miami, Hamptons Fine Art, Art Taipei, and in Seattle, where they were featured by Artsy in its list of “10 Works to Collect at the Seattle Art Fair.” Watson’s pieces have been covered by publications such as The Toronto Star, The Globe and Mail, NOW Magazine, and House & Home.

Ontario, Canada, August 11, 2023, Prominently featured in Bau-Xi Gallery’s new flagship location is Canadian contemporary artist Janna Watson. Paintings from her recent solo exhibition ‘I Didn’t Eat The Garnish’ are currently on display. This alluring collection was painted in her Toronto studio, just a short block away from the new gallery space on Geary Avenue.

On the corner of Dufferin Street and Geary Avenue (just north of Dupont Street), the Bau-Xi Gallery is located in an area of economic and cultural growth and finds good company with a number of other galleries, artisanal retailers, new residential development, and top-tier Toronto consultants and designers.

This building provides 22,500 sq. ft. of overall space, with approximately 17,500 sq. ft. (across two floors) allocated to the exhibition of painting, photography, and sculpture. The site also boasts a commercial-size kitchen for hosting events, as well as broadening Bau-Xi’s reach within the larger community – while bringing increased visibility.

With this move comes a substantial increase to their framing, shipping/receiving and art handling bandwidth allowing them to streamline processes and increase the level of services that they can offer to both artists and clients. Bau-Xi has been located across from the Art Gallery of Ontario for nearly 50 years, the gallery intends to maintain a presence in downtown Toronto, continuing to engage with the arts community that has blossomed in Toronto.

During a recent interview, Janna Watson commented, “The inspiration for this series is explorative play. I zoom into the micro-level of my compositions, moving beyond negative space to capture a more granular experience. I paint on the ground to contain the gravity of my watery mixes. Larger pieces have a more magnetizing draw with their ingredients; when I am over top of a work unfolding, I am both inside of it and a part of it.”

She continues, “It is this immersive view that inspired the series. The magic of mid-creation and the impending chemical reactions of subduing pigments are humbling. At times they master me, and I aim to capture this vacillant unfolding. Perspective needs space, to float at arm’s length and at a distance. Indulging is equally important. Eat cake! Eat the garnish too!”

Bau-Xi Gallery | Dufferin, 1384 Dufferin St, is open daily from 10 am – 5:30 pm.
Bau-Xi Gallery | Dundas, 340 Dundas St W, is open Tuesday through Saturday from 10:00am – 5:30pm.

Janna Watson Studio is open by appointment only.

For complete information, visit: www.jannawatson.com

Media Contact:

Janna Watson
Attn: Media Relations
126 Geary Avenue
Toronto, Ontario M6H 4H1 CANADA
studio@jannawatson.com

Exploring Maremma, a Quiet Corner of Italy

0

I woke up to the braying of donkeys. Opening the window to morning air perfumed by wisteria and honeysuckle, I could see the herd — 16 sweet-eyed animals in all — grazing by the olive groves of La Pescaia, a country estate turned idyllic inn that embodies a fantasy of pastoral happiness for me: life among animals and bird song and olive trees, encircled by the rugged nature of Maremma, in Italy.

The most sparsely settled area of Tuscany, spilling slightly into northern Lazio, Maremma retains vast swathes of nature reserves and uncontaminated woodlands, and over a series of visits, I took a deep-dive into countryside Zen, with horseback trips, hikes, bike rides, swims at protected beaches and improvised field sessions of donkey therapy.

“Here your days follow the cycles of the weather, animals and plants, and that natural rhythm gives life a sense of serenity,” said Margherita Ramella, who owns La Pescaia with her sister Beatrice. The siblings abandoned their careers in Milan to cultivate this rural endeavor.

My own rural mission began on horseback. In Maremma, traveling by horse was the customary way — long the only way — to navigate the dense and swampy territory, and the old horse trails endure, cutting through secluded woods and overgrown fields, past vineyards, farmland and the occasional quaint medieval village rising among the hills.

The butteri, Maremma’s unique brand of cowboys (and some modern-day cowgirls), are no longer numerous yet remain an active and integral part of the area’s identity. They chaperone packs of the Indigenous lyre-horned Maremmana cows, riding robust, wide-torsoed Maremmano horses in a tradition that some say dates back to the ancient Etruscans — rendering Maremma one of few places to possess such an enduring and vital equestrian link.

Tenuta di Alberese, a farm with 400 Maremmana cows run with support of the region of Tuscany, allows visitors to accompany the butteri on their daily horseback rounds — a task requiring a 7 a.m. start-time and enough expertise to gallop alongside them for several hours as they do the arduous work of herding (far more than what I, one morning’s feeble observer, possessed).

At La Pescaia, once famed for raising racehorses, there are horseback lessons, daylong excursions and nighttime full-moon rides for all levels. One early evening on my first visit there, my group saddled up at the pen and rode uphill through an enchanted-looking copse of gnarled cork trees, with the horses trampling wild mint and everlasting flowers under their hooves that released a balsam and absinthe tang into the damp evening air. Unsullied by city smog, the air was not just clean — it was charged with scent. An hour later, we came to a hilltop olive grove where an aperitivo of white wine and the farm’s own jams, honeys and local cheeses were set on a gingham-covered table. We watched the sun set over reddening wheat fields and forests before we rode back down as cicadas thrummed the arrival of dusk.

That night, in Castiglione della Pescaia, a half-hour’s drive towards the coast, a six-course dinner at Posto Pubblico included a spring salad with fresh peas and sea asparagus, a plate of charred octopus marinated in beets, and a dessert of buffalo milk gelato. For its ambitious cuisine, the restaurant sources high-quality, small-production ingredients from independent farmers and winemakers — a growing phenomenon in Maremma.

“A new generation took an interest in farming in the pandemic, and they’re doing it with biodynamic and sustainable methods,” said Alessio Cech, the talented young chef who opened the restaurant in 2016 with his brother Giulio.

Posto Pubblico is a standout gem for those interested in creative cooking, with a prix fixe tasting menu as well as more affordable pizzas, and on the restaurant’s romantic cobblestone piazza of tables (appropriately located on Via dell’Amore), preparations are underway to turn a medieval church depository into a natural wine bar offering casual dining, opening this autumn.

For an extended horseback journey, I met Piergianni Rivolta at his ranch in Civitella Marittima, from which he runs small group trail riding tours. Rain aborted our planned two-day excursion to the waterfalls of Val di Farma because some of the river crossings risked flooding, but we set out on another path, straddling our Maremmano horses on the cushy, horsehair-stuffed scafarda saddles that the butteri use.

“Maremma has a tradition you can’t find anywhere else today, but it’s fading, and the butteri, the old trails, and the nature here need to be protected and maintained,” said Mr. Rivolta, a rough-hewed, latter-day Robert Redford in a flat-brim fedora. I followed him, riding past a flock of sheep and vineyards of Sangiovese grapes, and then past fields of waist-high wheat and tracts overtaken by crimson clovers, yellow daisies and the amethyst blossoms of wild-growing peas.

We waded through rivers, and through meadows of spindly broom flowers grown thick and taller than our heads, where our horses blindly forged the way through the yellow nebula of blooms. Both days, we rode for hours without seeing a car or another human being, encompassed by nature so vividly bushy after the downpours that it seemed to grow before our eyes.

On a later visit, I went further south in Maremma’s interior, where I found Johnny Petrucci and Elizabeth Silvestri settling comfortably into small-town life after relocating during the pandemic from Rome to minuscule Pereta, a hilltop village of mostly medieval stone dwellings. There, the couple has converted a family home into Locanda Sospesa — a guesthouse of frescos, silk-covered walls and satin brocade curtains that lovingly recaptures the antique interiors of the residence, as if the velvet ropes at one of Italy’s great house museums were lifted to allow visitors to sleep in the display bedrooms.

“Covid gave us the freedom to change everything,” Mr. Petrucci said, as we regarded the hills from the balcony above their gardens. The steep slopes of forests and fields sprawled as far as the eye could see — an unending vista of greenery epitomizing the Arcadian experience of Maremma. “The city always felt like an external force working against me,” Ms. Silvestri said, a tabby cat purring contentedly on her lap in the sunshine. “But here I feel like I’m a part of nature.”

The pair arrange activities designed to give guests greater proximity to the local culture and landscape — hiking and cycling tours, horseback rides, lessons in basket-weaving with Maremman grasses, falconry demonstrations and more. I visited the hot springs of Saturnia, swimming in the bath-warm geothermal river, and tried a bioenergetic massage, but missed my chance to go asparagus hunting with Poldo Cirillo, a Pereta resident known for his foraging expertise.

Mr. Cirillo was busy when I arrived, as was the entire town, with Pereta’s annual festival — a cheese-tossing contest (this year, won by a female cheese-tosser for the first time ever), which was accompanied by bawdy accordion songs, wine served plein-air in plastic cups and a parade of children dressed in Renaissance finery — but ordinarily the sleepy village with just 67 residents in its center is a destination for travelers seeking calm.

The following morning, I set out on a hiking trip with Rudston Steward, a onetime New York party promoter who today leads the Maremma Safari Club, offering multiday hiking tours. We walked for hours, past yellow hills of rapeseed flowers, fields of chestnut trees, abandoned farmhouses and wild-growing asparagus, which Mr. Steward showed me how to pick.

“After Covid, people have become much more open to this kind of trip,” he said. “We evolved to walk and it works at a deep level on our brain. After all, travel should change your mind-state.”

By the time we reached a peak in the town of Monticello Amiata, my head was hushed and unburdened by the looming deadlines that usually haunt it. There, we lodged at Le Pianore, a farm-stay run by a family from Naples who had relocated to the Maremma countryside. They fed me a bountiful risotto dinner before sending me to bed in a new cabin built entirely of biodegradable straw and clay.

In the following day’s sunshine, along a thin tongue of coastal terrain connecting mainland Orbetello with the island of Monte Argentario, I arrived to a pier full of tables where the rustic restaurant I Pescatori serves fresh fish from the surrounding lagoon. With the water spreading out before me, I lunched on smoked eel and grilled mullet caught by the fishermen in the local cooperative. Since 1946 it has run this eatery as a showcase of the seaside’s simple cuisine, and as a support for small-time fishermen facing competition from fish farms and commercial trawlers.

After lunch, on a rented bike, I pedaled along the cycling path of Orbetello’s land-bridge and circled some of Monte Argentario. The island is a destination for fancy folks docking their yachts and sailboats, and home to the high-end Hotel Il Pellicanoand La Roqqa, Maremma’s much-anticipated new luxury hotel designed by the Milan design studio of Palomba Serafini, scheduled to open this month.

The Feniglia beach, a marine reserve of crystalline sea with pale sand and dunes of resin-redolent mastic brush, is largely free of Italy’s scourge of beach clubs. After a swim, I had to brake on my bike for a 20-strong troop of wild boar crossing the trail in front of me, with the adults shepherding babies along like a well-organized school field trip.

Wild boar is closely associated with Maremma — its outback and its cuisine — and the game meat was a star of the menu at Ristorante Fontanile dei Caprai that evening. Originally founded to provide sustenance to hunters in the nearby fields, today this eateryserves straightforward Maremman dishes in a wood cabin and on its outdoor terrace facing vineyards and the sunset.

My trip closed at the Parco della Maremma, home to the Tenuta di Alberese where I’d previously visited the butteri, and which comprises an expanse of protected land larger than Manhattan. Bikes, canoes and bird watching tours available are available, but on my last day, I just wanted to walk. From a high path along a rocky slope, I could see the umbrella pines below with their fir tops like fluffy cumulus clouds reaching all the way to the sea.

Accompanied by a chorus of trail-side frogs, I eventually wove my way through the woods to a beach with the Collelungo watchtower, a blocky 16th-century anti-pirate lookout. Underneath, on the long stretch of luminous sand bracketed by juniper bushes, the only man-made structures were makeshift lean-to shelters of sticks that had washed ashore. I took my last swim, gazing back at this dazzling green territory of wild boar and native horses, and tried to fix in my head this transcendence, this feeling of being a part of Maremma’s untamed nature.

Maremma offers the opportunity for a deep dive into nature, with horseback trips, hikes, bike rides, and swims at protected beaches. Here, places to stay, dine and book your adventures.

La Pescaia Resort in Sticciano is a 16th-century country villa and horse farm transformed into an elegant inn with riding opportunities (rooms from €280 a night, or $307).

Tenuta di Alberese, located in Alberese, is a state-funded farmstead with Maremmana cows offering visitors the chance to accompany its squad of butteri as they tend to the herd on horseback (€60 for an approximately four-and-a-half hour excursion).

Posto Pubblico in Castiglione della Pescaia is an ambitious restaurant with local farm-sourced ingredients which is expanding to include a natural wine bar (six-course tasting menu, €70 plus beverages; pizza from €10; wine from €6 a glass).

Corte di Ardengo, in Civitella Maritima, offers horseback rides from two hours to weeklong journeys with owner Piergianni Rivolta (starting from €50 for a two-hour ride).

Locanda Sospesa, in the hilltop town of Pereta, has turned a family home into a guesthouse with antique interiors (rooms from €180 a night).

Maremma Safari Club, based in Cinigiano, leads mult-day group hiking tours through Maremma and elsewhere with lodgings and meals included five-day hikes, €1,795)

Le Pianore, in Monticello Amiata, is an eco-friendly and family-run farm-stay (doubles from €120 a night).

Cooperativa I Pescatori in Orbetello, a casual restaurant, is run and supplied by a collective of local fishermen (about €25 for two seafood courses, plus beverages).

Ristorante Fontanile dei Caprai, in Marsiliana, originally supplied sustenance to hunters in the area’s woods and now serves traditional cuisine to all comers (about €25 for two courses, plus beverages).

Parco Regionale della Maremma, in Alberese, is a nature reserve set along more than 15 miles of coastline, with hiking, cycling, canoeing, horseback, and bird watching itineraries (entry is €10).


Follow New York Times Travel on Instagram and sign up for our weekly Travel Dispatch newsletter to get expert tips on traveling smarter and inspiration for your next vacation. Dreaming up a future getaway or just armchair traveling? Check out our 52 Places to Go in 2023.

Live Video: Watch Russia Launch the Luna-25 Moon Mission

0

Russia is going back to the moon too.

For the first time since the moon race with the United States in the 1960s and 1970s, Russia is set to launch a moderate-size robotic lander, Luna-25, that will be headed to the moon’s south polar region. The mission has been in development for years before Russia invaded Ukraine, but is also occurring at a moment when President Vladimir V. Putin is looking to space as one way to signal Russia’s return to great-power status.

Launch is scheduled for Thursday at 7:10 p.m. Eastern time from Vostochny, a spaceport in the far eastern part of Russia. (It will be Friday morning in Russia, 9:10 a.m. at Vostochny and 2:10 a.m. in Moscow.) Earlier in the day, the TASS news service reported that approval had been given to begin fueling of the rocket that will carry Luna-25 to orbit. About an hour before launch, a video feed from a cloudy launch site showed signs that propellants were being loaded to the vehicle. A report from mission control about 15 minutes ahead of the flight said that the vehicle’s systems were normal and ready for an on-time liftoff.

The Russian television network RT has started streaming live coverage of the launch beginning, as is Roscosmos, the Russia space agency, on its YouTube channel. Or you can watch the Russian-language stream embedded in the video player above.

After the success of NASA’s Apollo moon landings from 1969 through 1972, the world’s space agencies largely lost interest in the moon. Russia completed several robotic landings after the Apollo program’s conclusion, ending with the Luna-24 mission in 1976.

In the decades that followed, attention shifted to more distant destinations in the solar system. But the discovery of water ice in the shadowed craters in the moon’s polar regions has resurrected interest.

Russia has been attempting to revive its lunar program for the last quarter-century, and Russian officials have talked of sending Russian astronauts there too.

“The architecture of the lander is very similar to what the Soviet Union used to build for landing on the moon in the 70s,” said Anatoly Zak, who publishes RussianSpaceWeb.com, which closely tracks Russian space activities.

”However, it’s a scaled-down version” that takes advantage of some modern technological advances, Mr. Zak said. “When they decided to call it Luna-25, it’s kind of fair, because, in fact, it’s a continuation of the Soviet legacy.”

However, the Russian space program has been hampered by limited financing, economic sanctions imposed after the invasion of Ukraine and technological limitations, particularly for electronics. Some Russians have even expressed doubts about the prospects of the Russian moon exploration program.

“The Russian government is looking for any ‘victories’ to show how much they don’t care about sanctions,” said Denis Shiryaev, a Russian blogger who writes about technology. He added, “The news is most likely released for that, not for the actual launch.”

Luna-25 will launch on top of a Soyuz rocket that will put it into orbit around Earth. The rocket’s upper stage will then fire, propelling the lander on a journey of about five days to the moon.

Once at the moon, the Luna-25 lander will enter into a circular orbit 60 miles above the surface. The lander will spend about seven days nudging itself into an elliptical orbit that dips within a dozen miles of the surface. Roscosmos has not announced a planned landing date.

If Luna-25 lands successfully, it is to operate for at least a year. Its primary landing target is north of Boguslawsky crater, located at a latitude of about 70 degrees south. Planned experiments include scooping up soil and analyzing what it is made of. It could dig up some water ice below the surface.

Landers from several countries have sent robotic spacecraft to the moon in recent years. Only China has succeeded, going three for three.

The other landing attempts all crashed, including an attempt by the Japanese company Ispace in April.

Last month, India launched its latest moon mission, Chandrayaan 3. Taking a circuitous, energy-efficient route, Chandrayaan 3 entered orbit around the moon on Aug. 5, and its landing attempt, in a location in the south polar region, is scheduled for Aug. 23 — just about the same time as Luna-25.

Luna-25 is planned to be the first in a series of increasingly ambitious robotic missions headed to the moon. Luna-26 is to be an orbiter, while Luna-27 is a bigger, more capable lander.

Russian cooperation with NASA on the International Space Station continues, but Russia declined to join NASA’s Artemis program that is to send astronauts back to the moon. Instead, it announced it was working with China to build a lunar base in the 2030s.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has led the European Space Agency to end its collaboration with Roscosmos on planetary missions. A European-built experimental navigation camera was removed from Luna-25. ESA also ended cooperation on the ExoMars mission; its Rosalind Franklin rover was to launch on a Russian rocket and then be taken to the surface of Mars via a Russian landing system.

Anton Troianovski, Alina Lobzina and Milana Mazaeva contributed reporting.

Wisconsin judge allows civil case against fake Trump electors to proceed

0

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin judge on Thursday allowed a civil lawsuit filed against 10 fake electors for former President Donald Trump and two of his attorneys to proceed, rejecting a move to dismiss the case.

The lawsuit is moving ahead in Wisconsin after Michigan’s attorney general filed felony charges on July 18 against 16 Republicans who acted as fake electors for Trump, accusing them of submitting false certificates that confirmed they were legitimate electors despite Joe Biden’s victory in the state.

The fake elector plan was central to the federal indictment filed against Trump earlier this month that alleged he tried to overturn results of the 2020 election. Federal prosecutors said the scheme originated in Wisconsin.

Wisconsin’s Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul has signaled that he is relying on federal investigators to look into what happened in Wisconsin, while also not ruling out a state probe.

The pending civil lawsuit, filed by two Democratic electors and a voter, seeks $2.4 million from the fake GOP electors and two of Trump’s attorneys, alleging they were part of a conspiracy by Trump and his allies to overturn his loss in the 2020 presidential race. It also seeks to disqualify the Republicans from ever serving as electors again.

Wisconsin Republican Party Executive Director Mark Jefferson said in a statement that he was confident it will “come up short.”

He repeated the claim from the fake electors that they were acting as an “alternate slate” in order to “preserve an ongoing legal strategy.” Wisconsin Republicans were not told of any other purpose “and would not have approved any other use,” Jefferson said.

Scott Thompson, one of the attorneys who brought the lawsuit, said he was pleased with the order that will allow attorneys to “fully investigate and present our case in court.”

“Our democracy matters,” Thompson said. “So, we must seek accountability for those who attempt to undermine it.”

Dane County Circuit Judge Frank Remington has scheduled the case to go to a trial by jury in September 2024, two months before the presidential election.

Fake electors met in Wisconsin, Michigan and five other battleground states where Trump was defeated in 2020 and signed certificates that falsely stated Trump won their states, not Biden. The fake certificates were ignored, but the attempt has been subject to investigations, including by the House committee that investigated the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans who participated in Wisconsin said they were trying to preserve Trump’s legal standing in case courts overturned his defeat.

Electors are people appointed to represent voters in presidential elections. The winner of the popular vote in each state determines which party’s electors are sent to the Electoral College, which meets in December after the election to certify the outcome.

Democrats who brought the lawsuit in Wisconsin are represented by the Madison-based Law Forward law firm and the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at the Georgetown University Law Center.

In May, Remington also revived a complaint brought by Law Forward against the fake electors filed with the Wisconsin Elections Commission. That complaint sought sanctions against the fake electors.

In that ruling, Remington said the complaint must be heard again because a commissioner who considered the complaint last time should have recused himself. That commissioner, Robert Spindell, also served as a fake elector and is one of the defendants in the lawsuit seeking damages.

President Joe Biden won Wisconsin by nearly 21,000 votes, a result that has withstood recounts, partisan-led investigations, a nonpartisan audit and multiple lawsuits.

False Electoral College certificates were submitted declaring Trump the winner of Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, New Mexico, Nevada and Pennsylvania.

LIV Golf Has Embraced Trump, but Others Are Keeping Their Distance

0

Walking toward a tee box in Virginia in May, former President Donald J. Trump offered an awfully accurate assessment of the way many golf executives viewed him.

“They love the courses,” he said, forever the salesman for his family company’s portfolio of properties, “but I think they probably consider me a little bit controversial right now.”

As much as some leaders of men’s golf are trying to patch the rupture created by the Saudi-backed LIV Golf circuit, a tour Trump has championed, they seem to be in no rush to end the former president’s exile from their sport’s buttoned-up establishment. Even in an era of gaudy wealth and shifting alliances in golf, Trump remains, for now, a measure too much for many.

The consequences have been conspicuous for a figure who had expected to host a men’s golf major tournament in 2022. Now, his ties to the sport’s elite ranks often appear limited to LIV events and periodic rounds with past and present professionals. Jack Nicklaus, the 18-time major champion, caused a stir in April when he publicly stopped short of again endorsing a Trump bid for the White House.

Nevertheless, on Thursday, when he was playing a LIV pro-am event at his course in Bedminster, N.J., Trump insisted he was in regular conversations with golf executives about top-tier tournaments.

“They think as long as you’re running for office or in office, you’re controversial,” he said.

Golf has been a regular respite for Democratic and Republican commanders in chief. But no American president has had a more openly combustible history with the sport than Trump, and perhaps no president besides Dwight D. Eisenhower, who is thought to have averaged about 100 rounds annually when he was in the White House, has had so much of his public image linked to golf.

In the years before Trump won the presidency, he had at last started to make significant headway into the rarefied realms of golf.

In 2012, the U.S. Golf Association picked the Bedminster property for the 2017 U.S. Women’s Open. Two years later, the P.G.A. of America said it planned to take the men’s P.G.A. Championship to the course in 2022. Also in 2014, Trump bought Turnberry, a mesmerizing Scottish property that had hosted four British Opens, and he imagined golf’s oldest major championship being contested there again.

Once in the White House, Trump played with a parade of golf figures (though some of them appeared more attracted to the magic of the presidency than to Trump himself): Tiger Woods; Rory McIlroy; Ernie Els; Jay Monahan, the commissioner of the PGA Tour; and Fred S. Ridley, the chairman of Augusta National Golf Club.

Trump’s 2016 campaign and presidency had given some in golf heartburn. But it was the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol that most clearly chiseled away at his golf dreams. The P.G.A., which is distinct from the PGA Tour, which has dueled with LIV for supremacy over men’s professional golf, immediately moved its 2022 championship from Bedminster. The R&A, which organizes the British Open, made clear that it would not be bound for Turnberry anytime soon.

LIV soon emerged as something of a life raft, an insurgent league with a craving for championship-quality courses and plenty of money to spend. It did not hurt that Trump had been strikingly cozy with the government in Riyadh whose wealth fund was ready to pour billions of dollars into LIV — and let some of those dollars, in turn, roll toward the Trump Organization for reasons that have been the subject of widespread speculation.

Trump became a fixture at LIV events held at his courses, routinely jawing about the PGA Tour with variable accuracy. (He did, however, predict something like the planned transaction between the wealth fund and the PGA Tour.) This week’s event in New Jersey is his family’s fourth LIV tournament, and a fifth is planned for the Miami area in October.

But the budding détente between the Saudis and the PGA Tour does not seem to be leading to an immediate one between Trump and the broader golf industry, which the Saudis could have enormous sway over in the years ahead.

The PGA Tour has not publicly committed to maintaining the LIV brand if it reaches a conclusive deal with the wealth fund, and the tentative agreement says nothing about the future of men’s golf’s relationship with Trump. The PGA Tour has a history with Trump but ended its relationship with his company during the 2016 campaign. Tim Finchem, who was the tour’s commissioner then, denied at the time that the decision was “a political exercise” and instead called it “fundamentally a sponsorship issue.”

To no one’s surprise, the tour’s 2024 schedule, which the circuit released on Monday, features no events at Trump properties. And although Trump said a few months ago that he thought the Irish Open might be interested in his Doonbeg course, the DP World Tour, which is also a part of the agreement with the Saudi wealth fund, has said the course is not under consideration.

Other top golf figures who are not bound by any deal with the Saudis somehow appear even less interested.

“Until we’re confident that any coverage at Turnberry would be about golf, about the golf course and about the championship, until we’re confident about that, we will not return any of our championships there,” Martin Slumbers, the chief executive of the R&A, said on the same day last month when he signaled that the Open organizer might be willing to accept a Saudi investment.

Seth Waugh, the P.G.A. of America’s chief executive, declined to comment this week, but the organization has given no signal that it is reconsidering its thinking about Trump courses. The U.S.G.A. said it did not have a comment.

Some players, many of whom at least lean conservative, have suggested they would like to see Trump courses be in the mix for the majors.

“There’s no reason you couldn’t host P.G.A.s, U.S. Opens out here,” said Patrick Reed, who won the Masters Tournament in 2018 and played with Trump on Thursday. “I mean, just look at it out here: The rough is brutal.”

Even a sudden rapprochement, which would require executives setting aside the views of players like Reed that politics should not shape sports decisions, would almost certainly not lead to Trump’s strutting around a major tournament in the near future.

The next U.S. Open in need of a venue is the one that will be played in 2036; Trump would turn 90 on the Saturday of that tournament. P.G.A. Championships are booked through 2030. Between last month’s announcement that the 2026 British Open will be held at Royal Birkdale and the R&A’s sustained public skepticism of Trump, the last major of the calendar year seems unlikely to head to a Trump property anytime soon. And the Masters, which is always played at Augusta National in Georgia, is not an option.

Women’s golf offers a few more theoretical possibilities since its roster of venues is not as set, but Trump would face much of the same reluctance.

Trump has mused about the financial wisdom of golf’s keeping its distance from him. A few months ago, he argued that avoiding his courses was “foolish because you make a lot of money with controversy.”

He may be right.

But it seems golf is reasoning that it is making plenty of money anyway. Its political bent, some figure, might be better managed outside the glare of its major tournaments — and, moreover, beyond the shadow of Trump.

Supreme Court Pauses Purdue Pharma Opioid Settlement Pending Review

0

The Supreme Court agreed on Thursday to consider the government’s challenge of a bankruptcy settlement involving Purdue Pharma, putting on pause a deal that would have shielded members of the wealthy Sackler family from civil opioid lawsuits in exchange for payments of up to $6 billion to thousands of plaintiffs.

In doing so, the court sided with the Justice Department, which had requested the court put the settlement plan on hold while it considered reviewing the agreement. The government has argued that the family behind Purdue Pharma, maker of the prescription painkiller OxyContin, should not be able to take advantage of legal protections meant for debtors in “financial distress.”

The court’s order, which was unsigned, gave no reasons and included no public dissents, adds to the uncertainty around the plan to compensate states, local governments, tribes and individuals harmed by the opioid crisis while offering protection for the Sackler family. The order specified that the justices would hear arguments in the case in December.

The court’s decision to take up the challenge to the bankruptcy agreement is the latest twist in the yearslong legal battle over compensation for victims of the prescription drug crisis.

In May, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit approved the settlement plan as part of a court review of bankruptcy restructuring for Purdue Pharma. The company had filed for bankruptcy protections in September 2019. At the time, both the company and members of the Sackler family were facing lawsuits connected with the opioid crisis.

Although it is routine for companies who seek bankruptcy protection to be shielded from legal claims, the unusual part of this agreement was that it extended that liability protection to the company’s owners. Sackler family members have said they would not sign onto a settlement without an agreement protecting them from lawsuits.

The U.S. Trustee Program, an office in the Justice Department that oversees the administration of bankruptcy cases, has long argued that bankruptcy judges do not have the power to permanently block lawsuits against company owners if those owners haven’t sought personal bankruptcy protection.

The government has argued that federal appeals courts are split on this issue and that the settlement agreement may set a troubling precedent.

“Allowing the court of appeals’ decision to stand would leave in place a road map for wealthy corporations and individuals to misuse the bankruptcy system to avoid mass tort liability,” the solicitor general, Elizabeth B. Prelogar, wrote in a brief for the government.

The appeals court, Ms. Prelogar wrote, had “pinned itself firmly on one side of a widely acknowledged circuit split about an important and recurring question of bankruptcy law.”

Ms. Prelogar called the agreement “a release from liability that is of exceptional and unprecedented breadth.” She argued that the deal “applies to an untold number of claimants who did not specifically consent to the release’s terms,” a deal that “constitutes an abuse of the bankruptcy system, and raises serious constitutional questions.”

In a statement released after Thursday’s decision, a spokeswoman for Purdue Pharma said the company was “confident in the legality” of the bankruptcy plan.

Members of the Sackler family are no longer on the board of the pharmaceutical company. When the bankruptcy is finalized, they will no longer be owners of the company, which would be renamed Knoa Pharma and owned by its creditors. However, the family still remains wealthy. Some estimates put their fortune at $11 billion, much of it in offshore holdings.

Victims’ groups have expressed frustration at the government’s position, raising concerns that it would further delay payments to those harmed.

“Regardless of how one feels about the role of the Sackler family in the creation and escalation of the opioid crisis, the fact remains that the billions of dollars in abatement and victim compensation funds hinge on confirmation and consummation of the existing plan,” a brief filed on behalf of a victims’ group said. “These funds, which the Sackler family members are providing in exchange for releases, are critically needed now.”

Jan Hoffman contributed reporting.

ElmonX Set To Launch Exclusive NFT Collectables of Salvatore Mundi by Leonardo da Vinci – The World’s Most Expensive Painting Ever Sold

0

Two digital collectibles are launching on Saturday, 12th August at 9AM PT, only on ElmonX.com

London, United Kingdom, August 9, 2023, Meticulously crafted by Leonardo da Vinci around 1500, the Salvator Mundi is a mesmerizing masterpiece portraying Christ as the Savior of the World. With transcendent grace, Christ’s left-hand cradles a crystal orb, while his right bestows a benevolent blessing. Initially dismissed as a copy, the artwork’s true magnificence was unveiled through extensive restoration and scholarly inquiry. The precision of Christ’s features and the delicate orb are attributed undeniably to Leonardo, placing the painting among his masterpieces.

This 21st-century artistic treasure has enraptured art enthusiasts worldwide, culminating in a remarkable auction where it commanded a staggering USD 450,312,500. This price underscores the art world’s acknowledgment of its historical and artistic significance, solidifying its place as an iconic piece of artistic heritage with immeasurable worth.

As the gavel fell, the Salvator Mundi not only reaffirmed its peerless status but also highlighted art’s enduring ability to captivate and inspire across generations, poised to continue dazzling the world anew.

There will be two drops:

  1. Leonardo da Vinci | ElmonX Salvator Mundi Original
  2. Leonardo da Vinci | ElmonX Salvator Mundi Artist Proof

Leonardo da Vinci | ElmonX Salvator Mundi Original:

660 Digital Collectables will be available to purchase for £150.00 via credit card and ETH*, available only via public sale while supplies last at www.ElmonX.com

Key Information:

Public Sale: Saturday, 12th August 9AM PT
Price: £150.00
Editions: 660 (55 Reserved)
License: Bridgeman Images
Available: Globally at ElmonX

Leonardo da Vinci | ElmonX Salvator Mundi Artist Proof:

13 Digital Collectables will be available to purchase for £1100.00 via credit card and ETH*, available only via public sale while supplies last at www.ElmonX.com

Artist Proof Physical:

Purchase of the Leonardo da Vinci | ElmonX Artist Proof edition unlocks a matching physical museum quality pictorial depth print. The print measures 65.7 x 45.7 cm, the same size as the original Salvator Mundi. The physical AP print: uses rich blacks, vibrant hues, dramatic contrasts, and perfect reproduction of intricate details.

Artist Proof editions physical and digital are individually numbered on the back of the Salvator Mundi.

After purchasing the artist proof, support@elmonx.com will email buyers to confirm their shipping address.

Prints will be shipped within four weeks of the purchase date. Free shipping is included worldwide. Purchaser is liable for any customs taxes or local import costs that may occur.

How to Purchase:

The NFT collection is available for purchase at https://elmonx.com/  on a first-come, first-served basis. Each person is entitled to purchase one of each NFT.

As buyers proceed with the checkout process, they will be required to input their Ethereum (ETH) address and then mark the checkbox to make the payment using a card or ETH. After making their selection, a popup will emerge for them to finalize the payment for their NFT. Following a successful payment, this NFT will be minted into their wallet, undergoing a brief waiting duration for the transaction to confirm on the blockchain.

*Please note that currently, only MetaMask is available for ETH transactions. Transactions will incur an added gas fee which will fluctuate.

Buyers must be logged into the ElmonX.com website with a registered account. This will be the same as their app login username and password. The ElmonX team suggests setting up an account before the launch and confirming buyer’s email.

Please note that ElmonX cannot be held responsible if buyers mistakenly enter an incorrect ETH address during checkout.

Important Website Information:

The current ElmonX.com website will be moved to ElmonX.dev temporarily, this site will be available to use the AR functionality whilst they complete the full migration to the new ElmonX.com.

The existing ElmonX.com will transform into the new, enhanced, and updated website this week, before the launch takes place. This is where the drop will occur.

Additional Information:

ElmonX will retain mints 1–5 and 50 other randomly assigned mints.
The distribution of mint editions is random and not based on the order of purchase.

ElmonX 3D / Augmented Reality:

The purchase of any Salvator Mundi edition unlocks exclusive access to view buyer’s NFT in augmented reality by connecting their wallet to ElmonX.com. This feature is only accessible to holders of the NFT. Holders can scan a barcode to view the AR / 3D NFT on mobile as well as desktop.

About Bridgeman Images:

ElmonX has partnered with Bridgeman Images, secured with explicit permission, to introduce Salvator Mundi. Bridgeman Images stands as a global frontrunner in the distribution of art, cultural, and historical images, along with footage for reproduction. With a rich history of five decades, they have been delivering images from the world’s most esteemed museums, collections, and artists.

Their extensive collection spans centuries, diverse specializations, geographical regions, and artistic mediums, encompassing contemporary and fine art, photography, textiles, sculpture, maps, documentary footage, and more.

It’s important to note that while platforms like OpenSea and other secondary marketplaces might compress high-resolution quality within their 3D viewers, Salvator Mundi will proudly showcase its high-resolution nature within the ElmonX viewer and AR format.

About ElmonX:

ElmonX seamlessly integrates with an unalterable and highly secure distributed database of digital assets. By leveraging decentralized and immutable blockchain systems, ElmonX ensures transparent tracking of product origins and traceability across the entire supply chain. Collectors can utilize augmented reality to visualize and engage with the NFTs, adjusting the scale of the assets to perfectly suit their surroundings.

The ElmonX mobile apps are now available in beta, allowing collectors to reserve their username and join the waitlist. With a particular emphasis on licensed products, ElmonX aims to enhance the NFT collecting experience, particularly in the realm of art, through various offerings such as digital products, animation, and immersive experiences.

ElmonX will plant a tree for every sale made. They can be viewed their virtual forest here: https://ecologi.com/ElmonX

To stay up to date, follow ElmonX on social media: https://linktr.ee/elmonx

Media Contact:

ElmonX
Attn: Media Relations
London, UK
support@elmonx.com

elmon mundi
ElmonX Set To Launch Exclusive NFT Collectables of Salvatore Mundi by Leonardo da Vinci – The World’s Most Expensive Painting Ever Sold 2