22.7 C
New York
Sunday, July 6, 2025
Home Blog Page 962

An Art-Filled Swiss Idyll in Lausanne and the Joux Valley

0

The museum has a collection of more than 10,000 pieces, dating from 1816. Many are by Swiss artists, including the Giacomettis, father and son. When I visited, one floor featured a large, temporary exhibition of more than 100 paintings by the Swiss painter Gustav Buchet, an important figure in the avant-garde movements in early-20th-century Switzerland. I was captivated, though, by the more realist paintings of François Bocion, who frequently painted working boatmen along Lake Geneva in the 19th century. Bocion was obsessed with capturing the elusive beauty of light on water, and his obsession is our reward.

The museum isn’t strictly parochial, though. It also owns and displays boldface names, too: Degas, Renoir, Cézanne and Rodin, and there is an exhibition by a pioneer of textile art, Magdalena Abakanowicz, through late September.

The newest addition to Plateforme 10 caps the far end of the plaza: an enormous white cube, its only windows appearing where the cube seems to fracture. The building was designed by the Portuguese architects Francisco and Manuel Aires Mateus and opened in June 2022, along with the plaza. The cube houses the quarter’s two other museums, the Photo Elysée, the canton’s museum dedicated to photography; and Mudac, its museum of design and contemporary applied arts.

Inside, the ground level of this enormous block manages both a solidity and a tent-like airiness. Downstairs, an interactive photography studio was the best of museum education: Visitors can dress up with props, take digital photos and then edit them on a light table — all to teach concepts of framing and composition.

The photo exhibitions were at their best in the Elysée’s contribution to a districtwide exhibition on trains in art, showing photographs by Henri Cartier-Bresson, Nan Goldin and others. Many photos reminded how trains can represent escape and adventure, but also a Hail Mary for the desperate. Black-and-white shots of war refugees piling onto trains, taken 70 years ago, felt like they could have been taken last month.

F1: British Grand Prix Time, TV, Results

0

Lando Norris took the lead early and then he took the fight right to Max Verstappen. But a British Grand Prix that offered some early drama at Silverstone on Sunday eventually ended in the most predictable way possible: with Verstappen taking the lead back, pushing his Red Bull far out in front, and leaving everyone else racing for second place.

Verstappen earned his sixth straight victory, his eighth win of the season and his first at the British Grand Prix with yet another dominant day. The victory extended Red Bull’s record to perfect 10 wins in 10 races this season, and — combined with a win on the final day of last season — let the team equal McLaren’s Formula 1 record of 11 wins in a row, set in 1988.

But it was Norris, in a McLaren, who felt like the day’s biggest winner after holding off Lewis Hamilton’s Mercedes in an all-British battle for second place.

Norris’s result was the first podium finish for McLaren this season, and a welcome reward for his impressive performance holding off Hamilton, a seven-time world champion, in the final laps.

Hamilton tried everything to get around the 23-year-old Norris as the laps fell away. Feints inside. Sweeping turns out wide. Close-quarters maneuvering. But none of Hamilton’s experience or his skills could get him around a remarkable defensive drive by Norris. It was the first time two British drivers had stood on the podium at Silverstone since 1999. McLaren’s second car, driven by Oscar Piastri, was right behind in fourth place.

The most intriguing driver at Silverstone, the one teams and fans alike wanted to get a look at all week, was a fictional one: Sonny Hayes.

That’s the name of the character the actor Brad Pitt will play in a new Formula 1 film that spent the week shooting scenes and meeting people at the track — even setting up a fake garage and a fake hospitality trailer — as part of an effort at gathering intelligence, advice and race footage.

Teams seemed eager to get close to the project. Lewis Hamilton is part of the film’s production apparatus, Red Bull’s Christian Horner met with the filmmakers on Friday, and Mercedes even helped with the design of the cars of Pitt’s fictional Apex racing team.

“We’ve been involved pretty early,” Toto Wolff of Mercedes told reporters last week. “When we had the first discussions, we sent Brad to a driving school in France, going through the Formula cars from Formula 4 all the way up, and we tried to be helpful with the narrative. Lewis is an executive producer, so he wanted to make sure when the movie comes out, it’s as realistic as possible.”

Pitt and his co-star, Damson Idris, were around the grid all week, and several windows were carved out of the tight racing schedule to allow for filming on the track itself.

  • “I did what I could. I brought the fight to Max for as long as possible.” — Norris, on taking the lead at the start before surrendering it and focusing his efforts on protecting second place.

  • “We had a terrible start so we need to look into why that was.” — Verstappen, unwilling to be looking at the back of another car for even a single lap.

  • “That’s where I started, so to see them back on top warms my heart.” — Lewis Hamilton, a former McLaren driver, on seeing his old team on the podium.

Verstappen’s lead over his teammate Sergio Pérez, who rallied from another poor Saturday (he qualified in 15th) with another strong Sunday (he finished sixth), is now 99 points.

It also ensured that Verstappen would carry his points lead into September even if he stops showing up at races. (Spoiler: He will show up at all the races.)

The Elite Circle Clarence Thomas Entered That Led to the Supreme Court

0

“David and Peggy Sokol hosted us in Montana for a ranch visit and tour of Yellowstone,” the Thomases said in the letter, which was reviewed by The Times. The Thomases brought along their dog, Petey, who played with the Sokols’ dog, Bodie. They wrote: “Bodie showed Petey how to be a ranch dog, without a leash! LIBERTY!” Supreme Court

The trip, they concluded, was “pure heaven for all of us!”

The Clarence Thomas origin story begins in a dirt-floor shack in Pin Point, a tiny community founded by formerly enslaved people in the salt marsh lands outside Savannah.

When he is 20, after a brief spell in a Roman Catholic seminary, it continues at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Mass., where he is one of a small group of young Black men who integrate the school. There, in the spring of 1971, his senior year, he receives a letter from Yale Law School. He worries that the thin envelope means a rejection. But one of the nation’s most elite law schools wants him.

“My heart raced and my spirits lifted,” Justice Thomas wrote in his autobiography.

At Yale, he was one of only 12 Black students in his law school class, admitted the year the law school introduced an affirmative action plan. His white classmates viewed him as a token, he felt — a belief in the corrosive effects of affirmative action that was only deepened by his failure to win the law firm job he had dreamed of.

“I’d graduated from one of America’s top law schools, but racial preference had robbed my achievement of its true value,” he later wrote. Separately, he described leaving Yale as a new father, with a “swirling combination of frustration, of some disappointments, of some anxiety about the future, and some anxiety about how I would repay my student loans, how I would feed a young child, where I would live.”

Investigation Uncovers More of Clarence Thomas’ Undisclosed Freebies from Wealthy Pals

0
a13643a6adf784e641d45cbfa79f527d

Clarence Thomas’ connections to wealth and expensive vacations run deeper than billionaire businessman and Nazi-enthusiast Harlan Crow. The New York Times reports that Thomas has milked relationships with the rich he made through the Horatio Alger Association of Distinguished Americans, a scholarship association, to benefit himself and his wife.

Because of their Horatio Alger connections, Thomas and his spouse, Virginia, have been invited to join luxurious vacations and parties in addition being granted V.I.P. access to sports events. Thanks to the association, Thomas also rubbed elbows with the likes of Oprah Winfrey and Ed McMahon during a lavish three-day Montana birthday party for billionaire industrialist Dennis Washington.

But the connections Thomas made through Horatio Alger have benefitted him beyond lavish trips. Thomas’ Horatio Alger contacts — including Washington as well as investor David Sokol, formerly of Berkshire Hathaway — helped fund a documentary that painted him in a heroic light after the premier of an HBO movie that depicted Anita Hill during his confirmation hearings making sexual harassment allegations against Thomas. The Sokol family also hosted Thomas and his wife at their Montana ranch and their waterfront Florida estate. According to the Times, Thomas has not reported many of the benefits and gifts he has received from his rich and well-connected allies. The justice also declined to answer questions from the paper about the matter.

Early in his SCOTUS tenure, Thomas did report a number of personal gifts he received, including flights on private planes, cigars, and clothing. But after 2004, when The Los Angeles Times reported on his disclosures, Thomas ceased reporting to the court certain gifts and benefits he received. A ProPublica investigation in 2023 uncovered the justice’s close relationship with Crow, a GOP megadonor with a large collection of Nazi memorabilia and Hitler paintings, including trips on Crow’s private jet and yacht totaling tens of thousands and Crow’s purchase of the house where Thomas’ mother lived. Crow even paid tuition for Thomas’ nephew, who the Thomases were raising. After his relationship with Crow came to light, Thomas justified his lack of disclosures, claiming that “colleagues and others in the judiciary” advised him he did not need to report trips of “personal hospitality” from friends.

Thomas has not only accepted benefits that granted him access to places he otherwise may not have gone, he also hosts the Horatio Alger Association’s induction ceremony for new members in the Supreme Court’s courtroom, which the Times notes is “unusual access” for an outside group. The association has parlayed the access Thomas gives them to fundraise for scholarships and events, per fundraising records reviewed by the Times.

The court this year updated its disclosure rules to mandate justices report private jet travel and comped stays at hotels and resorts, but there is an exception for “personal hospitality,” meaning food, accommodations, or entertainment that is not related to business.

“The Horatio Alger Association has been a home to Virginia and me,” Thomas said when he received the association’s highest honor in 2010, adding that the association “has allowed me to see my dreams come true.”

If his dreams were of undisclosed fancy vacations and V.I.P. access, then that’s probably the case.

More from Rolling Stone

Best of Rolling Stone

p?c1=2&c2=6035310&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=2

Click here to read the full article.

Substance Abuse Is Climbing Among Seniors

0

When Dr. Benjamin Han, a geriatrician and addiction medicine specialist, meets new patients at the School of Medicine at the University of California, San Diego, he talks with them about the usual health issues that older adults face: chronic conditions, functional ability, medications and how they’re working.

He asks, too, about their use of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis and other nonprescription drugs. “Patients tend to not want to disclose this, but I put it in a health context,” Dr. Han said.

He tells them, “As you get older, there are physiological changes and your brain becomes much more sensitive. Your tolerance goes down as your body changes. It can put you at risk.”

That’s how he learns that someone complaining about insomnia might be using stimulants, possibly methamphetamines, to get going in the morning. Or that a patient who has long taken an opioid for chronic pain has run into trouble with an added prescription for, say, gabapentin.

When one 90-year-old patient, a woman fit enough to take the subway to his previous hospital in New York City, began reporting dizziness and falls, it took Dr. Han a while to understand why: She washed down her prescribed pills, an increasing number as she aged, with a shot of brandy.

He has had older patients whose heart problems, liver disease and cognitive impairment were most likely exacerbated by substance use. Some have overdosed. Despite his best efforts, some have died.

Until a few years ago, even as the opioid epidemic raged, health providers and researchers paid limited attention to drug use by older adults; concerns focused on the younger, working-age victims who were hardest hit.

But as baby boomers have turned 65, the age at which they typically qualify for Medicare, substance use disorders among the older population have climbed steeply. “Cohorts have habits around drug and alcohol use that they carry through life,” said Keith Humphreys, a psychologist and addiction researcher at the Stanford University School of Medicine.

Aging boomers “still use drugs far more than their parents did, and the field wasn’t ready for that.”

Evidence of a growing problem has been stacking up. A study of opioid use disorder in people over 65 enrolled in traditional Medicare, for instance, showed a threefold increase in just five years — to 15.7 cases per 1,000 in 2018 from 4.6 cases per 1,000 in 2013.

Tse-Chuan Yang, a co-author of the study and a sociologist and demographer at the University at Albany, said the stigma of drug use may lead people to underreport it, so the true rate of the disorder may be higher still.

Fatal overdoses have also soared among seniors. From 2002 to 2021, the rate of overdose deaths quadrupled to 12 from 3 per 100,000, Dr. Humphreys and Chelsea Shover, a co-author, reported in JAMA Psychiatry in March, using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Those deaths were both intentional, like suicides, and accidental, reflecting drug interactions and errors.

Most substance use disorders among older people involve prescribed medications, not illegal drugs. And since most Medicare beneficiaries take multiple drugs, “it’s easy to get confused,” Dr. Humphreys said. “The more complicated the regimen, the easier to make mistakes. And then you have an overdose.”

The numbers so far remain comparatively low — 6,700 drug overdose deaths in 2021 among people 65 and older — but the rate of increase is alarming.

“In 1998, that’s what people would have said about overdose deaths in general — the absolute number was small,” Dr. Humphreys said. “When you don’t respond, you end up in a sorrowful state.” More than 100,000 Americans died of drug overdoses last year.

Alcohol also plays a major role. Last year, a study of substance use disorders, based on a federal survey, analyzed which drugs older Americans were using, looking at the differences between Medicare enrollees under 65 (who may qualify because of disabilities) and those 65 and older.

Of the 2 percent of beneficiaries over 65 who reported a substance use disorder or dependence in the past year — which amounts to more than 900,000 seniors nationwide — more than 87 percent abused alcohol. (Alcohol accounted for 11,616 deaths among seniors in 2020, an 18 percent increase over the previous year.)

In addition, about 8.6 percent of disorders involved opioids, mostly prescription pain relievers; 4.3 percent involved marijuana; and 2 percent involved non-opioid prescription drugs, including tranquilizers and anti-anxiety medications. The categories overlap, because “people often use multiple substances,” said William Parish, the lead author and a health economist at RTI International, a nonprofit research institute.

Although most people with substance use problems don’t die from overdoses, the health consequences can be severe: injuries from falls and accidents, accelerated cognitive decline, cancers, heart and liver disease and kidney failure.

“It’s particularly heartbreaking to compare rates of suicidal ideation,” Dr. Parish said. Older Medicare beneficiaries with substance use disorders were more than three times as likely to report “serious psychological distress” as those without such disorders — 14 percent versus 4 percent. About 7 percent had suicidal thoughts, compared with 2 percent who didn’t report substance disorders.

Yet very few of these seniors underwent treatment in the past year — just 6 percent, compared with 17 percent of younger Medicare beneficiaries — or even made an effort to seek treatment.

“With these addictions, it takes a lot to get somebody ready to get into treatment,” Dr. Parish said, noting that almost half of the respondents over 65 said they lacked the motivation to begin.

But they also face more barriers than younger people. “We see higher rates of stigma concerns, things like worrying about what their neighbors would think,” Dr. Parish said. “We see more logistical barriers,” he said, such as finding transportation, not knowing where to go for help and being unable to afford care.

It may be “harder for older adults to try to navigate the treatment system,” Dr. Parish said.

Uneven Medicare coverage also presents obstacles. Federal parity legislation, mandating the same coverage for mental health (including addiction treatment) and physical health, guarantees equal benefits in private employer insurance, state health exchanges, Affordable Care Act marketplaces and most Medicaid plans.

But it has never included Medicare, said Deborah Steinberg, senior health policy attorney at the Legal Action Center, a nonprofit working to expand equitable coverage.

Advocates have made some inroads. Medicare covers substance use screening and, since 2020, opioid treatment programs like methadone clinics. In January, following congressional action, it will cover treatment by a broader range of health professionals and cover “intensive outpatient treatment,” which typically provides nine to 19 hours of weekly counseling and education. Expanded telehealth benefits, prompted by the pandemic, have also helped.

But more intensive treatment can be hard to access, and residential treatment isn’t covered at all. Medicare Advantage plans, with their more limited provider networks and prior authorization requirements, are even more restrictive. “We see many more complaints from Medicare Advantage beneficiaries,” Ms. Steinberg said.

“We’re actually making progress,” she added. “But people are overdosing and dying because of lack of access to treatment.” Their doctors, unaccustomed to diagnosing substance abuse in older people, may also overlook the risks.

In an age cohort whose youthful drinking and drug use have sometimes provided amusing anecdotes (a common refrain: “If you can remember the ’60s, you weren’t there”), it can be difficult for people to recognize how vulnerable they have become.

“That person may not be able to say, I’m addicted,” Dr. Humphreys said. “It’s a Rubicon people don’t want to cross.”

A joke about dropping acid at Woodstock “makes me colorful,” he added. “Crushing OxyContin and snorting it is not colorful.”

This Was No Ordinary Sunburn. What Was Wrong?

0

“Come in out of the sun,” the woman shouted to her 80-year-old husband. “You’re turning red!” The man reluctantly trudged toward the house. It was late afternoon — the end of a glorious summer day in Orange, Conn. But when he glanced down at his exposed arms, he could see that she was right. He was a bright pink, and soon he knew his arms and probably the back of his neck would be red and itchy. It was time to go inside.

He suspected that it gave his wife kind of a kick for him to be suddenly as sensitive to the sun as she had always been. He loved the sun and until recently thought it loved him back, turning his olive skin a deep brown that seemed to him a signal of health. But that spring he started to get red wherever the sun hit him. It wasn’t exactly a sunburn, or at least not the kind of burn his wife used to get that made her skin turn red and peel and hurt for days.

His sunburn was itchy, not painful, and lasted an hour or two, sometimes a little more. It certainly never lasted long enough for his dermatologist, Dr. Jeffrey M. Cohen, to see it. He told his doctor about the rash that spring when he went in for his annual skin exam. Cohen said he might be allergic to the sun and suggested an antihistamine and a strong sunscreen. He took the pills when he thought of it and slathered on the sunscreen some of the time, but he wasn’t sure it did much. Besides, who ever heard of being allergic to the sun?

He made an appointment with his dermatologist just before Christmas. It was one of those warm, sunny days in December, before winter really sets in, so he decided to make sure his doctor had a chance to see the rash. He arrived early and parked in the lot. He took off his jacket and stood in the sunshine that poured weakly over the building. After about 10 minutes he could see that he was getting pink, so he headed into the office.

“I’ve got something to show you,” he told Cohen with a smile when the doctor entered the brightly lit exam room. He unbuttoned his shirt to reveal his chest. It was now bright red. The only places on his torso that looked his normal color were those covered with a double layer of cloth — the placket strip beneath the shirt buttons, the points of his collar, the double folds of fabric over his shoulders. Palest of all was the area underneath his left breast pocket where his cellphone had been.

Cohen was amazed. This was clearly not a sunburn. To Cohen, it looked like a classic presentation of what’s called a photodermatitis — an inflammatory skin reaction triggered by sunlight. Most of these unusual rashes fall into one of two classes. The first is a phototoxic reaction, often seen with certain antibiotics such as tetracycline. When someone is taking these drugs, the sun can cause an immediate and painful sunburnlike rash that, like a regular sunburn, can last for days, causing blistering and even scarring. Clearly this patient had an immediate reaction to the sun, but he insisted his rash didn’t hurt. It just itched like crazy. And it was gone within hours. His reaction was more like a photoallergic dermatitis, in which sunlight causes hives — raised red patches that are intensely itchy and last less than 24 hours. But that didn’t quite fit either; photoallergic reactions aren’t immediate. They usually take one or two days to erupt after exposure to light.

Each reaction is triggered by medications. Cohen reviewed the patient’s extensive med list. Amlodipine, an antihypertensive drug, was known to cause this kind of photosensitivity, but the patient had started this medicine recently, months after he first mentioned the rash. Hydrochlorothiazide, another of his blood-pressure medicines, could sometimes do this. The patient had taken this drug for years and been fine, but at least in theory, this unusual type of reaction could start at any point.

Cohen explained his thinking to the patient. He would need to get a biopsy to confirm a diagnosis. The pathology would help him distinguish the inflammation of hives from the more destructive phototoxic reaction, which destroys the skin cells. And it would help him rule out other possibilities such as systemic Lupus erythematosus, an autoimmune disease that is most common in middle-aged women but can occur in men and women at any age.

A couple of days later, Cohen had his answer. It was hives — medically known as urticaria. This was a photoallergic reaction. And it was probably triggered by his hydrochlorothiazide. He should ask his primary-care doctor to stop the medication, Cohen told his patient, and after a few weeks he should stop getting the rash.

The man returned to Cohen’s office three months later. The rash was unchanged. After a few minutes in the sun he would be itchy and pink, even in the dead of winter. Cohen went back to the patient’s med list. None of the others had been linked to this type of reaction. “Tell me about this rash again,” he said. The patient went through his story once more. Any time sun hit his skin, even if the sun was coming through the window, he would turn red. When he was driving, the warm touch of the sun on his arm would cause an aggravating itch. And by the time he reached his destination that skin would be bright red. Hearing this description, Cohen suddenly realized he had it right the first time. The patient had developed an allergy to sunshine — a condition known as solar urticaria.

Cohen explained that this was not a sunburn. Sunburns are caused by light in shorter wavelengths known as ultraviolet B or UVB. That form of light cannot penetrate glass. The fact that he could get this reddening through his window indicated that his reaction was triggered by light with a longer wavelength, known as UVA. This is the form of light that causes skin to tan and to age, the form used in tanning salons.

Solar urticaria, he explained, is a rare disorder and not well understood. When sunshine penetrates the skin, it interacts in different ways with different cells. The most familiar are those cells that, when exposed, produce a pigment known as melanin, which tans the skin and offers some protection from other effects of the sun. In those with solar urticaria, the body develops an immediate allergic reaction to one of the cellular components changed by sunlight. How or why this change occurs is still not known. The allergy can start in young adulthood and may last a lifetime. And it’s hard to treat.

Sunscreen, Cohen told him, is a must — even when indoors. He would also need to take a higher dose of the antihistamine that he was prescribed — at least double the usual recommended dose. Patients are also advised to wear protective clothing. Solar urticaria can be dangerous. Extensive exposure to sunlight can trigger severe reactions and, rarely, a potentially lethal anaphylactic event.

The patient received the diagnosis just over a year ago and has been using sunscreen with an SPF of 50 ever since. He doubled the dose of his antihistamine. And most of the time, the medication plus long pants and sleeves and a hat keep him safe. Most of the time. And when he forgets, he knows he can count on his wife to let him know that he’s starting to turn red again.


Lisa Sanders, M.D., is a contributing writer for the magazine. Her latest book is “Diagnosis: Solving the Most Baffling Medical Mysteries.” If you have a solved case to share, write her at Lisa.Sandersmdnyt@gmail.com.

Tbilisi Pride Event Cancelled After Far-Right Group Storms Festival Grounds

0

A pride event in Tbilisi, Georgia, was cancelled after members of a far-right group stormed the festival grounds on Saturday, July 8.

Members of the group Alt-Info marched towards the festival grounds in the outskirts of Tbilisi, entered the event space, and destroyed venue installations as the police stood by, local news reported.

Tbilisi Pride, the event organizers, decided to call off the festival and evacuate the venue, they said.

Georgia’s Ministry of Internal Affairs had vowed to take “preventive measures” to assure the safety of the Tbilisi Pride event as several groups had threatened to hold a “counter-manifestation,” a statement released on Friday said.

After cancelling the event, Tbilisi Pride accused the Ministry of Internal Affairs of colluding with Alt-Info in its failure to protect the festival.

“Law enforcement representatives failed to protect the Pride Fest Event, did not prevent disruptive actions, and by exfiltrating organizers, de facto cancelled the event,” the President of Georgia, Salome Zourabichvili, said.

This footage by local journalist Mariam Nikuradze shows anti-LGBT protesters inside the festival grounds on Saturday. Credit: Mariam Nikuradze/OC Media via Storyful

Collapse of Dutch Government Highlights Europe’s New Migration Politics

0

The collapse of a Dutch coalition government over a proposed refugee policy has once again underscored the potency of immigration as an arbiter of Europe’s politics and how stopping far-right parties from capitalizing on it is a growing problem for mainstream politicians.

The current crisis in the Netherlands was precipitated by its conservative prime minister, Mark Rutte, who resigned after his centrist coalition partners refused to back his tough new policy on refugees.

Dutch media outlets reported that Mr. Rutte had proposed among other things a two-year waiting period before the children of recognized refugees living in the Netherlands could join their parents, a non-starter for his coalition partners.

For Mr. Rutte, a deft operator known as “Teflon Mark” for his resilience over 13 years in power, holding the line on an issue that many of his voters care deeply about was a matter of political survival, analysts say, that went beyond the life span of this particular coalition.

More broadly, his willingness to bring down the government rather than compromise on the issue speaks to a new phase of European migration politics. Recently empowered far-right parties have dominated the narrative on migration, seizing on growing public fears about national identity, and Mr. Rutte’s insistence on an unusual, tough policy seemed aimed at preventing just that, analysts said.

And that deeper issue is playing out against the backdrop of a cost-of-living crisis, insecurity stemming from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, a growing number of asylum seekers and migrant tragedies at E.U. borders.

Over the last decade or so, centrist parties have sought to accommodate the tough migration views of traditional conservative voters while coming together to keep the far-right parties at bay. But as the collapse of the Dutch government seems to show, that strategy may be running its course.

Mr. Rutte’s four-party coalition, which included two smaller parties to the left of his, was already in trouble. The way he chose to end it was akin to a controlled demolition.

“That the coalition collapsed over this topic is extremely surprising,” said Marcel Hanegraaff, an associate professor of political science at the University of Amsterdam. But that it collapsed, was barely a shock, he added. “It just wasn’t a happy marriage.”

Mr. Rutte has said he will not form a government with far-right parties such as Geert Wilders’ Party for Freedom, an anti-migration group that entered the scene nearly two decades ago in an earlier revolt against immigrants. Mr. Wilders has enjoyed limited electoral success, but his ideas found broader appeal and permeated mainstream politics after the Syrian refugee crisis in 2015, when more than one million refugees sought safety in Europe.

On the European stage, Mr. Rutte has emerged as a steadfast advocate for curbing migration to the European Union, carving a different role for himself from Italy’s Giorgia Meloni, who has roots in the far right, or Kyriakos Mitsotakis, the conservative Greek leader who has overseen brutal border practices against migrants.

Highlighting his role in Europe, and the growing significance of migration politics at home, Mr. Rutte accompanied Ms. Meloni and the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, on a recent visit to Tunisia, where the three offered the government up to $1 billion in financial aid and asked it to stop migrants from coming to Europe.

Mr. Rutte has also been a strong supporter of Europe-wide migration-management tools like the joint European Union border agency, with an eye toward keeping migrants away from Europe’s wealthy northern heartlands where his country lies.

In the European context, the Netherlands barely registers as a country with a serious migration problem. It’s the E.U.’s fourth-richest nation, but ranks right on the E.U. average in the refugee population it hosts. Still, the number of people seeking asylum in the Netherlands has grown over the past year, in step with the overall trend in Europe.

But Dutch analysts say that a critical issue that feeds the angst over migration is an affordable housing crisis, reinforced by the idea that the country, with its growing population and sprawling agricultural sector, is running out of space.

Critics say the tough line Mr. Rutte advocated would have had a limited impact even if it were enacted. The number of refugees in the Netherlands looking to have family members join them is so small, said Mark Klaassen, an assistant professor of Immigration Law at the Leiden University, that it would not make a meaningful dent in the total number of refugees.

Mr. Klaassen said that Mr. Rutte, known as a consensus builder who had previously been unwilling to utilize migration politics for his own advantage, seemed to be changing his stance. “What is new is that with this development, migration law is being used to gain political advantage,” he added.

Mr. Klaassen said that Mr. Rutte’s migration woes were in part of his own government’s making. Slow processing has worsened bottlenecks in the asylum process, Mr. Klaassen said. And the lack of affordable housing has led recognized refugees to overstay in processing centers because they struggle to find permanent homes, causing overcrowding and inhumane living conditions.

Attje Kuiken, the leader of the Dutch Labor Party, one of the two coalition members to object to Mr. Rutte’s proposals, called the decision to let the government fall over this issue irresponsible, citing a housing crisis and inflation as more pressing problems facing the Dutch government, among other things.

“Rutte chose his own interests over those of the country, and I hope everyone sees that,” Ms. Kuiken told a Dutch talk show.

“We saw a very different Mark Rutte,” said Jan Paternotte, the party chairman of the centrist D66, one of the coalition parties that refused to support some of Mr. Rutte’s migration policies. He added that Mr. Rutte refused to compromise on his proposals, and questioned the real motives behind the intractability.

The government’s collapse delighted Mr. Wilders, the right-wing leader, who took to Twitter to say that its end would make the Netherlands a “beautiful country again, with fewer asylum seekers and crime, more money and housing for our own people.”

What happens next in Dutch politics is not yet clear, and Mr. Rutte could still try to form a new coalition government, though he might face the same set of coalition options. On Friday evening he tendered his resignation to the Dutch king and will stay on as caretaker prime minister until fresh elections are held, likely in November.

After the Affirmative Action Ruling, Asian Americans Ask What Happens Next

0

Kawsar Yasin, a Harvard sophomore of Uyghur descent, found the Supreme Court decision last week banning race-conscious college admissions gut-wrenching.

Jayson Lee, a high school sophomore of Taiwanese descent, hopes the court’s decision will open the door for him and others at competitive schools.

And Divya Tulsiani, the daughter of Indian immigrants, can’t help but think that the decision would not put an end to the poisonous side of college admissions.

Asian Americans were at the center of the Supreme Court decision against Harvard and the University of North Carolina. In both cases, the plaintiffs said that high-achieving Asian American applicants lost out to less academically qualified students. In Harvard’s case, Asian Americans were docked on a personal rating, according to the lawsuit, launching a painful conversation about racial stereotyping in admissions.

But in the days following the court’s ruling, interviews with some two dozen Asian American students revealed that for most of them — no matter their views on affirmative action — the decision was unlikely to assuage doubts about the fairness of college admissions.

“I don’t think this decision brought any kind of equalizing of a playing field,” Ms. Tulsiani said. “It kind of did the opposite.”

Lower courts found that Harvard and U.N.C. did not discriminate in admissions. But the Supreme Court ruled that, “however well intentioned and implemented in good faith,” the universities’ admission practices did not pass constitutional muster, and that race could no longer be considered in deciding which students to admit.

The court noted that the two universities’ main response to criticism of their admissions systems was, “essentially, ‘trust us.’”

The universities said they would comply with the ruling. Harvard added that it “must always be a place of opportunity, a place whose doors remain open to those to whom they had long been closed.”

In a community as large and diverse as the Asian American community, opinions on affirmative action were wide ranging. A recent Pew Research Center poll conveyed the ambivalence of Asian Americans. Only about half of Asian Americans who had heard of affirmative action said it was a good thing; three-quarters of Asian respondents said that race or ethnicity should not be a factor in college admission decisions.

A few students found hope in the Supreme Court’s decision.

Mr. Lee, the Maryland sophomore, is interested in studying science and technology and supports standardized tests and other traditional measures of merit.

“Before the case, yes, I did have worries about my ethnicity being a factor in college admissions,” he said. “But if colleges implement the new court rulings to get rid of affirmative action, then I think that it will be better, and more even, for every ethnicity.”

Others had more mixed feelings. Jacqueline Kwun, a sophomore at a public high school in Marietta, Ga., whose parents emigrated from South Korea, said she has felt the sting of stereotyping, when people assumed she was “born smart.”

Even so, she said she believed the court’s ruling was wrong.

“Why would you shut the entire thing down?” she asked. “You should try to find a way to make yourself happy and make other people happy at the same time, so it’s a win-win situation, rather than a win-lose.”

In the majority opinion, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote that colleges could consider mentions of race in the essays students submit with their applications if they could be tied to, for instance, overcoming discrimination through personal qualities like “courage and determination.” But many Asian American students had doubts about that prescription.

Students already feel pressure to write about hardship, said Rushil Umaretiya, who will go to the University of North Carolina in the fall. He wrote in his essay about how the women in his Indian immigrant family were the breadwinners and intellectuals, and how his grandmother rose through the white male-dominated ranks at the Roy Rogers restaurant chain to become a regional manager.

Even before the decision, he had seen anxious classmates at his selective high school, Thomas Jefferson High School, in Alexandria, Va., making up stories about facing racial injustice.

“I think college admissions has really dipped into this fad of trauma dumping,” he said.

Ms. Tulsiani, who is studying for a master’s degree in sociology and law at New York University, is a veteran of the application process.

She wrote an application essay for Georgetown about her family — her father worked his way up from deli worker and taxi driver to owning restaurants — in response to a prompt about diversity.

“You accept that you have to sell some kind of story in order to appeal to this audience,” she said.

She was glad the court preserved the diversity essay option, but felt sympathy for the applicants having to spill their most intimate secrets and speak with moral force. “It’s a huge burden on a 17-year-old child,” she said.

She thinks the stigma of affirmative action will persist. “The narrative will be, instead of ‘you got in because of affirmative action’, ‘you must have gotten in because of your class,’” she said.

Some Asian American students believe, contrary to the dominant narrative in the court case, that they have benefited from affirmative action. Evidence introduced in court showed that Harvard sometimes favored certain Asian American applicants over others. For instance, applicants with families from Nepal, Tibet or Vietnam, among other nations, were described with words like “deserving” and “Tug for BG,” an abbreviation for background.

“I do believe I was a beneficiary,” said Hans Bach-Nguyen, a Harvard sophomore from Camarillo, in Southern California. He said he was not sure until he requested his admissions file and found that one of the two reader comments in it concerned his Vietnamese heritage.

He was happy, he said, to be recognized as a member of an underrepresented minority in higher education. But he wondered whether he was fully deserving. His parents came to the United States as refugees at around his age, and got college degrees at state universities.

“I think my guilt comes from that I did not grow up low-income,” he said.

Echoing a common criticism of the university, he noted that many Harvard students, “even if they are from minority backgrounds, are from financially stable or more affluent families.”

In California, affirmative action has been banned since 1996, but even so, a few Asian American students there seemed suspicious of what they thought of as a secretive admissions process.

Sunjay Muralitharan, whose family is of Indian origin, was rejected or wait-listed by his top five college choices, a mix of public and private colleges in California. He believes his race was a factor. He ended up at the University of California San Diego, where he is a sophomore.

“I know people are saying, ‘Oh, it’s just going to be merit-based, merit-based, merit-based,” he said. “No, it’s not.”

Still, he said, he has gotten over his initial resentment. “I grew up middle-class, I never had to worry about where the next meal was coming from,” he said. “Like it or not, I was put into a bunch of tutoring programs. It’s understandable to give an opportunity to someone who didn’t have the same amount of opportunities when they were younger.”

Colbi Edmonds and Anna Betts contributed reporting.

Mets and Padres Face Off to Close MLB’s First Half

0

Just as the experts would have predicted before the season began, the Mets and the Padres opened a series against each other to close the season’s first half as two of the hottest teams in baseball.

A sweep in Arizona lifted the Mets to a fifth consecutive victory, equaling their season high. As the summer’s final three days before the All-Star break arrived on Friday, the Mets’ win streak was tied with surging Cincinnati’s for the best in the majors.

The Padres, following Thursday’s day off, came sprinting into the weekend after dumping the Los Angeles Angels in a three-game sweep. As Yu Darvish lined up against Justin Verlander for an intriguing start to a weekend of baseball in San Diego — Friday’s crowd of 42,712 was the Padres’ 37th sellout this season — both teams were swinging with abandon and rolling in momentum.

“They’re just another team in our way,” Pete Alonso, the Mets’ only All-Star this season, said coolly Friday as the series opened.

And the Padres proved to be just that on the first night of a three-game series, with the Mets winning, 7-5, in 10 innings, extending their winning streak to six games. It now is the longest in the majors — Cincinnati lost in Milwaukee on Friday — and it is the second-longest streak to begin the month of July in club history, following a 10-0 start in 1991.

“We need to go on a streak,” Verlander said after Friday’s win. “Some games are like yesterday’s and some games are like today’s — some things go your way.

“It seems like a lot of things haven’t been going our way, so it’s nice to see”

The high-stakes tension to keep a season from slipping away was evident in Ha-Seong Kim’s reaction when he was thrown out trying to stretch a double into a triple with one out in the seventh inning of a 3-3 game. Angry at his mistake, he kicked a water cooler in the dugout, injured his big right toe and the Padres listed his status as day-to-day. His absence would be a blow: Kim has been batting leadoff and is one of San Diego’s best players. With 4 wins above replacement, by Baseball Reference’s formula, he is ranked second in the National League among position players behind Atlanta’s Ronald Acuña Jr., and he leads all major leaguers in defensive WAR.

In many ways, the start of the series felt as if the teams were picking up where they had left off last October when deafening noise, kaleidoscopic colors and taut tension were the hallmarks of a memorable three-game wild-card series in which the Padres ended the Mets’ season at Citi Field.

The futures of both teams seemed limitless at the time.

Well, maybe not so much.

Instead, these star-studded teams with outrageous payrolls and outsized expectations remain mirror images of each other, all right. But the images are distorted as if by a fun-house mirror.

Despite their recent hot streaks, the Mets and the Padres have very little to show for more than a half-billion in combined payrolls for the 2023 season. The Mets’ total payroll is estimated at more than $340 million, according to Spotrac, while the Padres are on the hook for more than $240 million. For all that cash, each team entered the weekend at 41-46, which was 6.5 games behind the Philadelphia Phillies for the National League’s third wild-card spot.

The Mets’ desperation to fix their season was embodied by shortstop Francisco Lindor during the sweep of Arizona. He was so ill that he nearly had to skip Wednesday’s game, and he bounced back only after receiving intravenous fluids for dehydration. He then went 5 for 5 with two triples and a homer as the Mets whipped the first-place Diamondbacks, 9-0, on Thursday.

Goodbye, virus; hello, optimism?

“We’re going to make something out of it,” Lindor promised after the game. “Now the question becomes how deep we’re going to go.”

The Padres’ own desperation was evident a night earlier. They had returned from a 1-5 run through Pittsburgh and Cincinnati that Manager Bob Melvin termed a “miserable trip.” With two wins against the Angels, they had a chance to finish their first series sweep of the season. San Diego’s All-Star closer, Josh Hader, had worked on Monday and Tuesday and had not pitched on three consecutive days since 2021. Sensitive to overuse after his years in Milwaukee, he had declined an opportunity to do it in San Francisco last month.

Yet with the Padres leading by 5-3 in the ninth inning on Wednesday, here came Hader.

“He’s got a sense of where we are as a team,” Melvin explained afterward. “So he wanted the ball tonight in a save situation.”

Desperate times.

“It was the right situation and I was able to make it happen,” Hader said on Friday. “It comes down to making sure you’re healthy. In the long run, if I can’t provide for the team later because of injury, then it’s no use.”

Though the Padres’ rotation led the N.L. with 39 quality starts through Thursday, they stepped into the series with the Mets with a fairly modest goal of extending their modest winning streak into what would be a season-high four consecutive wins.

Stringing together victories has been hard thanks to their .219 batting average with runners in scoring position, which was the worst in the majors entering Friday’s game. A team with sluggers like Manny Machado, Juan Soto, Xander Bogaerts and Fernando Tatis Jr. was staring up at dreadful clubs like Oakland (29th, .229), Kansas City (28th, .233) and Detroit (27th, .236).

The Padres’ .194 batting average in “late/close” situations — defined by Baseball Reference as “any plate appearance from the seventh inning on in which the batting team is either in a tie game, ahead by one run or has the potential tying run on deck” — was ranked 29th in the majors through Thursday.

Not surprisingly, given those numbers, the Padres were 1-36 when trailing after seven innings. The Cardiac Kids, they are not.

Still searching for a combination that clicks, San Diego parted ways with the struggling designated hitter Nelson Cruz on Tuesday, designating him for assignment. There was no reason to have him and Matt Carpenter both as veterans on the bench to pinch-hit, even if one bats right and the other left.

It was not the type of move that had been expected from a team that sprinted all the way to the N.L. Championship Series last October before losing to Philadelphia. And it showed how much the Padres would need to change if they wanted to get back to contention.

“We’ve got to come out every day and play like it’s our last one,” Bogaerts said.

The Mets and the Padres have been such enigmas this summer that each team’s owner conducted what amounted to a mini State of the Union address within four days of each other.

On June 28 at Citi Field, Steven A. Cohen offered public support for Manager Buck Showalter and General Manager Billy Eppler. He reiterated that he still planned to hire a president of baseball operations. The game’s worst-kept secret, of course, is that David Stearns, the former president of the Brewers, is likely to fill that role once his contract with Milwaukee expires.

On July 1, in an interview with The San Diego Union-Tribune, the Padres’ owner, Peter Seidler, showed support for A.J. Preller, the team’s president of baseball operations, who is under contract through 2026. Like Cohen, Seidler said he valued “stability.” He added: “I’m for excellence. And to me, A.J. is excellence.”

Speaking Friday, Machado, like Seidler, chose the optimistic, long view.

“It makes everything more special when you struggle,” Machado said. “You look back, like, I went through all this and, damn, look how positive things turned out.”

Now, what are arguably the game’s two most disappointing teams have what could be their last chance to push away the gloom by extending the small glimpses of sunlight they captured in the early days of July. The trade deadline looms on Aug. 1, and Eppler and Preller must soon decide whether to be buyers or sellers.

After going 7-19 in June, the Mets pounded out 17 hits and collected 32 total bases Thursday night. The Mets played a crisp, well-rounded series against a sneaky good team. Manager Buck Showalter said Arizona is as athletic as anybody the Mets have faced this year.

During their six-game winning streak, Mets starting pitching have compiled a 1.80 E.R.A. Carlos Carrasco threw his finest game of the season Thursday, and Verlander and Max Scherzer are up and running together in the rotation after detours including injuries and, for Scherzer, a 10-game suspension for a violation of the league’s ban on the use of foreign substances on a baseball.

Though Verlander wobbled through parts of his start in San Diego, surrendering two earned runs and walking three in six innings, he now has worked six or more innings in seven of 12 starts this season.

“Every day is its own entity and we just want to be able to build off of solid performances,” said Alonso, who took early batting practice on his first day in San Diego in preparation for Monday’s Home Run Derby in Seattle. “You can’t think about too much in the future. You just want to focus on winning today.”